|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Popp, Jennie S. Hughes; Abdula, Arby; Newton, Doris J.; Pittman, Dianne; Danforth, Diana M.. |
Research in the mid 1900s suggested that salary gaps existed between men and women in academia. Though the research helped bring attention to salary gaps, less focus was on causes of salary differences. More recent research suggested differences in salaries were based on performance. A survey was sent to agricultural economics professionals at land grant intuitions to identify the factors that influence their salaries. Results of the ordered probit model suggest that seven variables can be used to explain salaries: having attained tenure, working at an 1862 institution, the amount of grant dollars, the number of journal articles, highest academic rank and the percentage of appointment that is in administration (positive influences) and importance of... |
Tipo: Conference Paper or Presentation |
Palavras-chave: Salary and performance; Tracking survey; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; A11; A14. |
Ano: 2009 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/46722 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Oleinik, Anton. |
Modernity is usually thought as a complex society with clearly differentiated spheres of everyday life. It means, in particular, that economic rules do not interfere with the norms structuring political, social, scientific and other interactions. The complex, differentiated society sharply contrasts with a "small" and homogeneous "pre-modern" society. The process of modernization, i.e. differentiation of the spheres of everyday life, can take various forms. In an advanced country it relies on internal forces. Modernization in this context looks like an evolutionary, "bottom-up" development. In a backward country (Russia and Germany in the first half of the 20th century), modernization requires a strong governmental (from the top to the bottom)... |
Tipo: Working or Discussion Paper |
Palavras-chave: State bureaucracy; Economic backwardness; Catch-up modernization; Conservative modernization; Opportunism; Institutional constraints; Power; Authority; Invidious comparison; Institutional importation; Democracy; Shared mental model; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; A13; A14; B15; B25; B52; D73; H83; K42; N40; O17; P21; P37; P51. |
Ano: 2005 |
URL: http://purl.umn.edu/26333 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|